Analyzing Intangible Cultural Heritage through Dell Hymes’ SPEAKING Model: The Case of the Turkish Evil Eye Bead
Project no. 33129 · Status: Kapanmış (Yayın bekleniyor) · 2025
Summary
<p>The <em>nazar boncuğu</em> (Turkish evil eye bead) holds a deeply rooted place in Türkiye’s cultural memory and is traditionally used as a symbol of protection against the evil eye and harmful influences. Although it may appear to be a tangible object, its production and use constitute a significant example of intangible cultural heritage. Dell Hymes’ SPEAKING model provides an effective analytical framework for examining the communicative dimensions of this cultural object. According to the model, the production process takes place within specific social contexts (Setting), involves traditional roles such as master and apprentice (Participants), and is shaped by the purposes of cultural preservation and transmission (Ends). The Act Sequence encompasses a ritualized process ranging from melting and shaping the glass to creating and applying the characteristic motifs.</p><p>The language and behaviors employed during the production of the <em>nazar boncuğu</em> reflect a particular tone (Key), in which the transmission of knowledge is characterized by seriousness, tradition, and respect. Verbal communication, bodily gestures, and the tools associated with craftsmanship (Instrumentalities) constitute the primary means through which knowledge and skills are communicated. In accordance with established Norms, the master’s authority is recognized, while production techniques are preserved and transmitted through tradition. The Genres associated with the production and cultural meanings of the <em>nazar boncuğu</em> are closely intertwined with folk narratives, traditional beliefs, and proverbs. Thus, the <em>nazar boncuğu</em> functions not merely as a visual object but also as a form of cultural expression. In accordance with UNESCO’s definition of intangible cultural heritage, its production process represents a form of collective memory that is transmitted from generation to generation (UNESCO, 2003; Smith & Akagawa, 2009).</p><p>Within this context, Hymes’ SPEAKING model makes it possible to interpret the production of the <em>nazar boncuğu</em> not merely as a craft, but also as a communicative practice, a process of meaning-making, and a means of transmitting cultural identity. Such an analysis demonstrates the importance of examining not only the cultural product itself but also the social, linguistic, and symbolic interactions embedded in its production process. Accordingly, the SPEAKING framework contributes to intangible cultural heritage studies by revealing how cultural knowledge, values, practices, and identities are continuously negotiated, reproduced, and transmitted through communicative interaction.</p>