In-Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Posterior Adhesive Restorations Fabricated Using Three Different Techniques
Project no. 32594 · Status: Kapanmış (Yayın bekleniyor) · 2025
Summary
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the optical properties of adhesive restorations fabricated using different methods for the treatment of single tooth loss in the posterior region after an aging process and to assess their mechanical durability. The secondary objective is to investigate the effect of static and dynamic intraoral chewing forces on fracture resistance using the Finite Element Stress Analysis (FESA) method.</p><p><strong>Materials and Methods: </strong>This study utilized 120 extracted human teeth, consisting of 30 mandibular premolars and 30 mandibular molars for posterior restorations and also 30 maxillary canines and 30 maxillary central incisors for anterior restorations. The extracted teeth were grouped into pairs (one molar - blank - one premolar / one canine – blank – one central) according to their positions in the dental arch and embedded in acrylic blocks with their coronal parts exposed. To simulate periodontal tissues, a silicone impression material was used. The teeth were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the fabrication technique used for restoration.</p><p>- Group 1 (3B): Restorations fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) dental printer (n=10). The teeth were scanned using an intraoral scanner (Trios 3, 3Shape, Denmark) and digitally uploaded. The restorations were designed using a computer-aided design program (DWOS, DentalWings, Montreal QC, Canada) and then fabricated with a 3D dental printer using a resin material (VarseoSmile Crown Plus; BEGO, Bremen, Germany).</p><p>- Group 2 (FO): Restorations fabricated using fiber mesh and direct composite (n=10). In this group, a fiber mesh scaffold (Interlig, Angelus, Brazil) was used, onto which a flowable composite (Charisma Flow, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) and adhesive (Gluma Universal Bond, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) were applied. The restorations were completed with a direct composite (Charisma Smart, Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany).</p><p>- Group 3 (IK): Restorations fabricated using the indirect composite technique (n=10). In this group, a freehand indirect composite technique was applied using Signum (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany).</p><p>Following restoration, the L, a, b* values** of the samples were recorded before and after the aging process using a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany), in accordance with the CIEDE2000 color formulation. Subsequently, the compressive strength test was conducted using a universal testing machine (Shimadzu AG-X, Kyoto, Japan) to evaluate the mechanical resistance of the restorations. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using one-way ANOVA variance analysis and post-hoc Tukey tests (p<0.05). Finite element stress analysis was applied in order to determine the accuracy and consistency of the fracture strength (KIC) values measured in the study in a simulation environment that can mimic the conditions in the oral environment.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> When examined in terms of fracture strength, the ANOVA test results for posterior restorations showed mean fracture strengths of 396.34 MPa for group 3B, 1057.9175 MPa for group FO, and 763.11 MPa for group IK. A statistically significant difference was found between the mean fracture strengths of the three groups (p < 0.05). The post-hoc test also revealed a significant difference in fracture strength between groups 3B and FO (p < 0.05). Regarding color change parameters, FO had the highest ΔE00 values, showing significant differences with both groups 3B and IK. Groups 3B and IK were similar, with no significant difference between them.</p><p>In anterior restorations, the fracture strength values of group 3B (536.88 MPa) were statistically significantly higher than the other groups (p < 0.05). When color change values were examined, the FO-group had the highest ΔE00 values, similar to posterior restorations, while a significant difference was found with the HR group and the 3D group (p <0.05). Mechanical test results were consistent with SESA simulation data for posterior restorations, but consistency was only found for the 3D and HR groups in anterior restorations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The use of fiber mesh in the posterior region, where chewing forces are high, increases mechanical strength. Furthermore, improvements in the mechanical properties of materials are needed for the use of restorations produced with newer three-dimensional dental printers. However, in the anterior region, where chewing forces are lower, for single tooth loss, these materials are affected by cavity geometry and volume. Therefore, it was determined that one-piece 3D-printed restorations are more successful in terms of both color change and fracture resistance.</p>