ETERMINATION OF FEED VALUES OF SOME ALTERNATIVE PROTEIN SOURCES USED IN NUTRITION OF RUMINANTS BY IN VITRO GAS PRODUCTION TECHNIQUE (HOHENHEIM FEED TEST)

Project no. 22676 · Status: Kapanmış (Yayın bekleniyor) · 2021

Summary

<p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>DETERMINATION OF FEED VALUES OF SOME ALTERNATIVE PROTEIN SOURCES USED IN NUTRITION OF RUMINANTS BY <em>IN VITRO</em> GAS PRODUCTION TECHNIQUE </strong></p><p>(HOHENHEIM FEED TEST)</p><p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p><p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p><br></p><p>This study was carried out in two stages to determine the feed values ​​of some alternative protein source microalgae (<em>Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris and Schizochytrium spp.</em>) with <em>in vitro</em> gas production technique (Hohenheim Feed Test). In the first stage, the crude nutrient compositions values ​​of the research material microalgae were found by <em>in vitro</em> Weende analysis method. In the second stage, the gas production (GP) amounts of these microalgae were found as a result of the incubation period of 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours with <em>in vitro</em> gas production technique, and then they were incubated using 24-hour gas formation and some crude nutrient contents. IVOMD (<em>In vitro</em> Organic Matter Digestion), ME (Metabolic Energy) and NEL (Net Energy Lactation) values ​​were calculated. In the study, AA (Acetic acid), PA (Propionic acid), BA (Butyric acid), Total (∑) VFA (Volatile fatty acids) and CH4 VFA (Methane volatile fatty acids) were calculated. The mean crude protein contents of <em>Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris </em>and<em> Schizochytrium spp. </em>microalgae used in the study were 61.69 %, 41.03 and 15.40 in dry matter (DM) respectively. The average gas production amounts of the same microalgae for 3 and 72 hours were calculated between 11.17 and 28.23 ml/200mg DM, between 7.35 and 44.54 ml/200mg DM, and between 2.86 and 10.85 ml/200mg DM, respectively. In addition, the mean of&nbsp;IVOMD, ME and NEL values of <em>Spirulina platensis</em>, <em>Chlorella vulgaris</em> and <em>Schizochytrium spp.</em> microalgae were 68.64%, 2464 and 1406 kcal/kg DM for <em>Spirulina platensis</em>; 73.71%, 2442 and 1437 kcal/kg DM for Chlorella vulgaris; 31.10%, 1935 and 1010 kcal/kg DM for <em>Schizochytrium spp.</em> were found. In addition, the mean ∑VFA, CH4VFA values of <em>Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris</em> and <em>Schizochytrium spp.</em> used in the study respectively; 3.33 mg/mL, 1.13 mol/mol VFA for <em>Spirulina platensis;</em> 5.72 mg/mL, 1.86 mol/mol VFA for <em>Chlorella vulgaris;</em> <em>Schizochytrium spp.</em> for 2.37 mg/mL, 0.70 mol/mol VFA were found. In conclusion, when microalgae as crude protein alternative topic&nbsp;respectively from largest to smallest <em>Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris</em> and <em>Schizochytrium spp.</em>; crude cellulose, which is an important factor in the formation of methane, according to the 24-hour gas production amounts, ME, NE and CH4 VFA values<em>, Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina platensis,</em> and <em>Schizochytrium spp</em>. were found to be different from largest to smallest, respectively. As an alternative protein source in ruminant nutrition, respectively; it can be said that <em>Chlorella vulgaris,</em> <em>Spirulina platensis</em> can be used, whereas it is more advantageous to use <em>Schizochytrium spp</em>. as a feed additive because it affects rumen methane suppression and reduction.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong><em>Microalgae, feed value, in vitro</em>, methane.</p>

View details