Clinical Evaluation of Tooth-Supported Posterior Resin Nanoceramic Crowns Fabricated by Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing: A Short-Term Clinical Study
Project no. 32957 · Status: Kapanmış (Yayın bekleniyor) · 2025
Summary
<p>Additive manufacturing techniques in digital dentistry are increasingly being used as an alternative to conventional subtractive manufacturing techniques, and it is essential to scientifically evaluate the clinical performance of these materials. The aim of this thesis was to prospectively assess the clinical performance of ceramic-filled hybrid resin crowns fabricated using Digital Light Processing (DLP)-based three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in cases requiring single-unit crown restorations in the posterior region.</p><p>Premolar (PM) and molar (M) teeth requiring crown restorations in the posterior region were included in the study (44 patients, 52 restorations). All restorations were fabricated using a fully digital workflow, including intraoral scanning (iTero Lumina, Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA), computer-aided design (CAD) (Exocad DentalCAD, Exocad GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), and DLP-based 3D printing (Varseo XS, BEGO GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany). The restorations were adhesively cemented, and clinical evaluations were performed at baseline (T0) and at the 6-month follow-up (T1). Clinical success was assessed using the Modified USPHS criteria and the Revised FDI criteria.</p><p>No statistically significant difference was observed in the clinical performance of the restorations when comparing T0 and T1 evaluations (p > 0.05). The occlusal wear behavior of the restorations was evaluated both clinically and quantitatively using digital image superimposition (3D superimposition) with Geomagic Control X (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA), based on root mean square (RMS) values. According to the RMS results, no statistically significant difference in wear was found between premolar and molar groups (PM: 20.82 ± 9.35 µm; M: 26.14 ± 28.41 µm; p = 0.380).</p><p>The short-term (6-month) follow-up results demonstrated that 3D-printed hybrid resin crowns exhibited clinically satisfactory performance. However, fractures occurred in two restorations during the follow-up period; one was repaired intraorally and continued to function, while the other required replacement. Additionally, acute pulpitis developed in one case following adhesive cementation, and endodontic treatment was performed.</p><p>Although 3D-printed hybrid resin crowns provide satisfactory clinical outcomes in the short term, they should be carefully evaluated regarding fracture risk, particularly under high occlusal stress. No statistically significant difference was found in time-dependent wear levels (p > 0.05).</p>