The Effect of Different Denture Cleaning Methods on Candida Albicans Uptake on Two Base Resins and a Soft Lining Material Surface

Project no. 22757 · Status: Kapanmış (Yayın bekleniyor) · 2021

Summary

<p><strong>Aim:</strong> To investigate the efficacy of different denture cleaning methods on <em>C.Albicans</em> incubated on two base resins and a soft liner.</p><p><strong>Materials and Methods:</strong> For this study, a total of 90 polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyamide (Deflex) and soft liner (Molloplast B) disc specimens were prepared in 2×10 mm dimensions. ATCC 10231 strain was activated by incubation at 37°C for 24 hours in Saboraud Dextrose Agar medium. All of the specimens were coded by placing in 90 propylene tubes and autoclaved by adding Saboroud Dextrose Broth medium on them.&nbsp;The final cell number was adjusted to 105 CFU by adding <em>C.Albicans</em> solution to the tubes.In order to allow the <em>Candida</em> cells to attach to the discs, they were left to incubate for 48 hours. The tubes were rotated with a vortex device to transfer the cells attached to the surface of the samples to the artificial saliva. Artificial saliva was taken into a petri dish with a micropipette, Saboraud dextrose agar was added to it, and left for incubation. Reproducing <em>C. Albicans</em> were counted according to the CFU method by making markings on the petri dish. Afterwards, the samples were cleaned with Corega® cleaning tablet, Dettol ® liquid soap and BEE'O UP® propolis drops twice a day for 9 days. On the 5th and 9th days, the amount of <em>C.Albicans</em> on the samples was counted according to the CFU method.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Before applying the cleaning protocol, the differences between PMMA and polyamide and between polyamide and soft liner were significant at p˂0.05 significance level, the differences between PMMA and soft liner was found to be insignificant (p&gt;0,05). After the cleaning protocol was applied, the differences between PMMA and soft liner and polyamide and soft liner were significant (p&lt;0,05). On the 9th day, the differences between effervescent tablet and liquid soap were significant (p&lt;0,05); The differences between effervescent tablet and propolis drops were significant, and the differences between liquid soap and propolis drops were insignificant (p&gt;0,05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Effervescent cleaning tablets are currently effective denture cleaning agents for PMMA and polyamide. Similar results were obtained with propolis in the&nbsp;cleaning method with liquid soap. Propolis drop solution can be used as a cleaning agent for soft lining materials by improving its formulation.</p><p><strong>&nbsp;</strong></p><p><strong>Keywords: <em>C.Albicans</em> ,PMMA, polyamide, soft lining , propolis, cleaning methods</strong></p>

View details