Comparison of the Effect of Indirect Restorations on the Fracture Resistance of Open-Apex Maxillary Anterior Teeth Following Revitalization Therapy: An In-Vitro Study
Project no. 33002 · Status: Kapanmış (Yayın bekleniyor) · 2025
Summary
<p>To date, no study has been identified in the literature investigating the effect of indirect restorative materials and restoration types on the fracture resistance of revitalized immature maxillary anterior teeth with open apices. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different indirect restorations on the fracture resistance of immature anterior teeth following revitalization treatment and to determine the most durable indirect restorative material and restoration design, thereby contributing to the existing literature.</p><p>A total of 48 extracted human permanent maxillary central incisors with a single root and a single canal, extracted for periodontal, prosthetic, or orthodontic reasons, will be included in the study. To simulate immature teeth with open apices, root canals will be enlarged using Peeso reamers sizes 1–4. To simulate tooth loss due to trauma, a fracture line will be created on the central incisor, starting halfway along the crown length mesially and progressing obliquely, leaving tooth tissue above the enamel-cementum junction at the distal end of the tooth for approximately one-third of the crown length.</p><p>Revitalization procedures will be performed according to the guidelines of the European Society of Endodontology, and Biodentine will be placed into the root canal. Subsequently, teeth will be randomly assigned to four groups according to the type of indirect coronal restoration. In Group 1, endocrown restorations will be fabricated indirectly using a polymer composite disk, whereas in Group 2, indirect endocrown restorations will be fabricated using Gradia Plus composite resin. In Groups 3 and 4, a core structure will be constructed over the Biodentine using a Trinia CAD/CAM fiber block, followed by standardized tooth preparation. Crown restorations will then be fabricated using a HIPC polymer composite disk in Group 3 and Gradia Plus composite resin in Group 4.</p><p>All restored teeth will be embedded in silicone impression material and acrylic resin to simulate periodontal tissues. Specimens will be subjected to thermal aging (10,000 cycles) and subsequently tested for fracture resistance. The maximum load at fracture will be recorded in Newtons (N). Fracture resistance values and fracture patterns among the different indirect restoration techniques and materials will be compared using either a two-way ANOVA or a two-way robust ANOVA, depending on the normality of data distribution, with the level of significance set at p< 0.05.</p><p></p>