D-PRISM, a global study of diagnostic approaches in severe pneumonia.
Makaleler > Tam Makale · 2024
Yazarlar: Luis Felipe Reyes, Cristobalina Mayorga, Zhongheng Zhang, Ichiro Tsuji, Gennaro De Pascale, Vanessa Prieto, Mervyn Mer, E. Sheehan, Prashant Nasa, Goran Abdulla Sabir Zangana, Kostoula Avanti, Alexis Tabah, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Hendrik Bracht, Arie Zainul Fatoni, Khalid Abidi, Helmi Sulaiman, Vandana Kalwaje Eshwara, Liesbet De Bus, Yoshihiko Hayashi, Pervin Korkmaz, Ali Ait Hssain, Niccolò Buetti, Qing Yuan Goh, Arthur Kwiziera, Despoina Koulenti, Nathan D. Nielsen, Pedro Póvoa, Otávio T. Ranzani, Jordi Rello, Andrew Conway Morris
Greater South Information System, Uluslararası, 2024
DOI: 10.60692/7bw4v-beq24
Özet
Abstract Purpose Pneumonia remains a significant global health concern, particularly among those requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite the availability of international guidelines there remains heterogeneity in clinical management. The D-PRISM study aimed to develop a global overview of how pneumonias (i.e., community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired (HAP), and Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)) are diagnosed and treated in the ICU and compare differences in clinical practice worldwide. Methods The D-PRISM study was a multinational, survey-based investigation to assess the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia in the ICU. A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to intensive care clinicians from 72 countries between September to November 2022. The questionnaire included sections on professional profiles, current clinical practice in diagnosing and managing CAP, HAP, and VAP, and the availability of microbiology diagnostic tests. Results A total of 1296 valid responses were collected from ICU clinicians, spread between low-and-middle income (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC), with LMIC respondents comprising 51% of respondents. There is heterogeneity across the processes of diagnosis, including in clinical assessment where 30% (389) did not require radiological evidence to diagnose pneumonia, variable collection of microbiological samples and use and practice in bronchoscopy. Modal antibiotic treatment duration was 5–7 days for all types of pneumonia. Conclusions This study highlighted variations in clinical practice and diagnostic capabilities for pneumonia, particularly issues with access to diagnostic tools in LMICs were identified. There is a clear need for improved adherence to existing guidelines and standardised approaches to diagnosing and treating pneumonia in the ICU.