Agreement Between Adolescents, Parents, and An Expert In Visual Assessments of Adolescent Posture: An Exploratory Pilot Study
Makaleler > Tam Makale · 2026
Yazarlar: Dilek BAYRAKTAR, ÖZGE BAYKAN ÇOPUROĞLU, Eda ER, Tahsin Oğuz BAŞOKÇU, Anıl Murat ÖZTÜRK
Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, ESCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi, Uluslararası, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), 2026, cilt 37, ss 185-194
DOI: 10.4274/jtss.galenos.2026.85547
Özet
<p>Objective: This exploratory pilot study examined agreement among visual classifications of adolescent posture made by adolescents, parents, and an expert using the same standardized reference images. It also explored whether adolescent-expert agreement differed between adolescents with mild-to-moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and healthy controls. Materials and Methods: Forty adolescents aged 10-18 years (20 with AIS and 20 healthy controls) and one parent per adolescent participated. Adolescents, parents, and one expert independently selected one of five standardized images for each of the following regions: head, shoulders, upper-back, and lumbar/waist. Pairwise and three-rater agreement were assessed using Cohen’s κ, Fleiss’ κ, and Krippendorff’s α. Exact agreement proportions were reported with Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Region-specific adolescent-parent comparisons were performed using exact McNemar tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment for the four regional comparisons. AIS-control comparisons were considered exploratory. Results: Adolescent-expert agreement ranged from κ=0.30 to κ=0.43 and was highest for the head (κ=0.43, 95% CI, 0.24-0.62). Exact adolescentexpert agreement was 62.5% (95% CI, 47.0-75.8) for the head, 60.0% (44.6-73.7) for the shoulders, and 45.0% (30.7-60.2) for both the upper-back and lumbar/waist regions. Parent-expert agreement ranged from κ=-0.01 to κ=0.26, with exact-agreement proportions ranging from 25.0% to 40.0%. Adolescents showed greater exact agreement than parents only in the head region (62.5% vs. 37.5%; p=0.031), but this difference did not remain significant after Holm-Bonferroni adjustment (adjusted p=0.124). No statistically significant AIS-control differences were detected in total adolescent-expert agreement scores (p=0.151) or parent-expert agreement scores (p=0.306). Conclusion: Agreement with the expert’s visual classification varied across anatomical regions and was generally moderate. No evidence of equivalence between the AIS and control groups can be inferred from this pilot sample. The findings represent expert-referenced agreement rather than objective recognition accuracy and do not establish the visual approach as valid, reliable, or clinically applicable. Larger studies incorporating multiple assessors, repeated measurements, and independent reference methods are required.</p>