PARADİGMALAR VE ŞAHİTLİKLER: GETİCA’DA ‘REX/KRAL’ VE ‘REGNUM/KRALLIK’ KAVRAMLARI ÜZERİNE
Book chapter > Chapter Research Book · 2016
Authors: Abdullah ÜSTÜN
Halil İnalcık Armağanı III Tarih Araştırmaları, Chapter Research Book, Doğu Batı, Nationally Recognized, National, 2016, pp 117-127, Turkey, Ankara
Summary
<p><em>The History of the Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages is a rather developed </em><em>area of study from the perspective of European-centrist or Europe-centred </em><em>historiography that encompasses a wide range of activities from preparing </em><em>translations of the literary sources, sometimes including different editions, into a </em><em>variety of language, to examining those sources through various theories. This highly </em><em>developed state of affairs in this field is firstly due to the extensive studies of the </em><em>Roman Empire, while the contributions of Germanic and Slavic studies should also be </em><em>acknowledged. However, it must be acknowledged that compared to the </em><em>aforementioned fields, studies in to the Huns whom we encounter in a lot of events and contexts, from the Germanic tribes' turn towards western Europe to the spread of </em></p> <p><em>the Slavic people through the Balkans and to the collapse of the Roman Empire in the </em><em>west, are rather puny, with the notable exception of the efforts of the Hungarian </em><em>academics. Studies on other Turkish groups that succeeded the Huns, or in the largest </em><em>sense of the topic, studies on the Altaic peoples are in a similar situation as well. It is </em><em>quite possible that the mythic references to the Huns or to their leader Attila in the </em><em>European culture might be due to the fact that studies on the Huns have not been as </em><em>developed, which gave an aura of mystery to the Huns, as their history remained </em><em>shrouded in darkness. This paper shall attempt to shed light on the present situation </em><em>in the historiography of the Huns, the background over which the said historiography </em><em>stands, and some major issues in the historiography of the Huns, in the hopes that </em><em>this will at least contribute to a general assessment. Such a line of inquiry, however, </em><em>will naturally lead to some generalizations and cause certain categorizations. The </em><em>author of this study humbly acknowledges that while both effects contribute to a </em><em>better understanding of the topic at hand, they inevitably lead us astray from the </em><em>"pure truth". </em></p> <p><em>Keywords: </em></p> <p><em>Historiography, Historiography of the Late antiquity, the steppe peoples, </em><em>Huns</em></p>